Festival Community
This website is using cookies to. By clicking 'OK', you agree with our cookie policy. More about this.

GALLERY 2010/2011

visual communication practice



Description of idea

Describe your idea and concept of your work in relation to the festival outlines:

The idea in this project was demmonstrate the pure moment of a deep on a ocean. It translates the sensation of a deep in love.

What kind of communication approach do you use?

Pocket devices, like cellphone, minicameras and small devices incoporated in our life.

What are in your opinion concrete benefits to the society because of your communication?

Just to bring some sensation or feeling using just few resources in a short time.

What did you personally learn from creating your submitted work?

The importance of a free deep in anything you want.

Why is your work, GOOD communication WORK?

It´s simple.

Where and how do you intent do implement your work?

Every smal screen i could see.

Did your intervention had an effect on other Media. If yes, describe the effect? (Has other media reported on it- how? Were you able to change other media with your work- how?)

Curators comments More info on Curators & Editors ›

What could one say about "the pure moment" of a dive in the sea? Refreshing! But the responses to the questions in "Description of idea" should had given more insight in the motivation and aesthetics of the work.
"The object which I apprehend presents itself as purely "one" and single: also, I am aware of the "property" (Eigenschaft) in it, a property which is universal, thereby transcending the particularity of the object. The first form of being, in which the objective reality has the sense of a "one", was thus not its true being; and since the object is the true fact here, the untruth falls on my side, and the apprehension was not correct. On account of the universality of the property (Eigenschaft) I must rather take the objective entity as a community (Gemeinschaft) in general. I further perceive now the property to be determinate, opposed to another and excluding this other. Thus, in point of fact, I did not apprehend the object rightly when I defined it as a "commonness" or community with others, or as continuity; and must rather, taking account of the determinateness of the property, isolate parts within the continuity and set down the object as a "one" that excludes. In the disintegrated "one" I find many such properties, which do not affect one another, but are indifferent to one another. Thus I did not apprehend the object correctly when I took it for something that excludes. The object, instead, just as formerly it was merely continuity in general, is not a universal common medium where many properties in the form of sense universals subsist, each for itself and on its own account, and, qua determinate, excluding the others. The simple and true fact, which I perceive, is, however, in virtue of this result, not a universal medium either, but the particular property by itself, which, again, in this form, is neither a property nor a determinate being, for it is now neither attached to a distinct "one" nor in relation to others. But the particular quality is a property only when attached to a "one", and determinate only in relation to others. By being this bare relation of self to self, it remains merely sensuous existence in general, since it no longer contains the character of negativity; and the mode of consciousness, which is now aware of a being of sense, is merely a way of "meaning" (Meinen) or "intending", i.e. it has left the attitude of perception entirely and gone back into itself. But sense existence and "meaning" themselves pass over into perception: I am thrown back on the beginning, and once more dragged into the same circuit, that supersedes itself in every moment and as a whole.

Consciousness, then, has to go over this cycle again, but not in the same way as on the first occasion. For it has found out, regarding perception, that the truth and outcome of perception is its dissolution, is reflection out of and away from the truth into itself. In this way consciousness becomes definitely aware of how its perceptual process is essentially constituted, viz. that [169] this is not a simple bare apprehension, but in its apprehension is at the same time reflected out of the true content back into itself. This return of consciousness into itself, which is immediately involved and implicated in that pure apprehension--for this return to self has proved to be essential to perception--alters the true content. Consciousness is aware that this aspect is at the same time its own, and takes it upon itself and by so doing consciousness will thus get the true object bare and naked."
Hegel, in "Phenomenology of Mind"

View other works commented by André Vallias  ››

Other comments

No comments yet

Curators comments

This work has been commented by 1 curator(s):
André Vallias go to comments ›

Entry details




Just a deep on a Sunday of love.

Concept author(s)

André Hime and Huila Gomes

Concept author year(s) of birth

1985 e 1980

Concept author(s) contribution

Everything made together.



Competition category

visual communication practice

Competition subcategory


Competition field


Competition subfield


Subfield description

We work with moving and static image, sound and every kind of art