Selfie. Or on the fetishism of self-timer.

by daniele

This work has been commented by 1 editor(s). Read the comments

Title

Selfie. Or on the fetishism of self-timer.

Concept author(s)

Daniele Torcellini

Concept author year(s) of birth

1978

Concept author(s) Country

Italy

Friendly Competition

Radical intimacies: dialogue in our times (2014)

Competition category

Critical writing

Competition field

nonacademic

Competition subfield

professional

Subfield description

I am a collaborator of the Art Museum of The City of Ravenna. I am a teacher of Metodologies and Techniques of Contemporary at the Academy of Fine Arts in Ravenna and of Cromatology at the Academy of Fine Arts in Genoa. I am Ph.D. in contemporary art with a research on the history of color photographic reproduction of artwork. My work deals with color perception, art history, visual culture, art reproduction, color photography.

Check out the Radical intimacies: dialogue in our times 2014 outlines of Memefest Friendly competition.

About work

Abstract

The text is a short article strictly related to a tumblr blog I submitted to the visual communication section. The text is dedicated to the self-referring and circular communication of the selfie practice which distopically appears as “I communicate myself to myself”, though whoever chooses to portrait him/herself desperately tries to signify it as “I communicate myself to the world”. Something like a missed or interrupted dialogue. The text deals with the very contradictory nature of the self-portrait as a communication practice, suspended between the allure of paintings honoured by the history of art and erotic, ironic and made-in-bathroom, contemporary pictures.

Keywords

selfie, self-portrait, social network, art history

Editors Comments

Eric Louw

One feels the author’s frustration and sense of disempowerment born of living in a world where digital communication technologies facilitate poor communication on such a mass scale. I share the author’s concerns.

This triggers reflection on the nature of communication past and present. Is today’s digital communication so different from the past? Or is digital communication just another platform? If it is different – how is it different?

The growth of selfies rises a whole bunch of issues worthy of consideration. Some do relate to the nature of the digital platform. But others concern communication more generally, and in this regard one should not ignore the possibility that theorists from long ago may have valuable insights. One of these is Goffman’s “The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life”.

Comments